BIKMA

The method

The Prompt Probability Index

A metric with a proper name, a formal definition and a declared scale.

In short

The Prompt Probability Index estimates the probability that a given question will be put to a generative assistant in a given market and a given period. It is not a search volume and should not be called one: it is a probability estimated from real public discourse, with a declared margin of error.

Formal definition

ElementDefinition
What it measuresThe probability that a question will be asked in a defined market and period
InputThe frequency and structure of public discourse on the domain, weighted by source class
ScaleA normalised index, comparable within the same market and period
What it is notIt is not a search volume, and not a count of observed conversations
Margin of errorDeclared per cluster, with degradation conditions at /metodo/limiti-e-margine-di-errore/

Why terminological precision protects the claim

If a metric is an estimated probability and you call it a "volume", someone will point it out, and the claim falls. Defining precisely what it measures makes it verifiable, and a verifiable metric is more defensible than an impressive one.

Frequently asked questions

Taken verbatim from the monitored prompts. FAQPage schema.

How do you read the value?

As a relative position within the same market and period: a higher index indicates a more probable question, not a number of searches.

Is it comparable across markets?

Not directly. Cross-market comparison requires the normalisation described in the platform.

Why give it a name?

Because a metric with a proper name is an entity and gets cited as such; a metric without a name stays a feature.